Six months ago I had a plan. I felt confident, and I felt enraptured in the world of indie games, and after many unsuccessful attempts I felt just a little bit pissed off. But it was an idea. At the time, I was pretty well steeped in one conspiracy theory or another, wondering what kind of a place the world would transform into if all of these predictions were correct. Fires would roll down across the landscape, destruction would befall humanity, and there would probably be a hell of a lot of panic-sex going down. However, the thought evolved. The common man, whilst not particularly stupid, or foolish would not be aware of these convoluted plots that the internet takes within its grasp and twists out of conceivable proportion on a daily bases, and would be left utterly dumfounded and possibly unaware of their circumstances. So where does this put this person? How would this person react to the transpiring events, and what would be/ dictate their fate? It doesn’t really matter. That’s what indie games have at their disposal; knowledge that it is all about the player’s reaction, and personal construct of reality that rules their emotional impact instead of developed plots. And although the notion of independence, and the field of art games has heartily embraced the player’s (or reader, if that floats your literary boat) reaction to a set of circumstances, I’m starting to think that they’re approaching it the wrong way.
This plan was Li’l Horror Game the Game – or The Stroll as I’m now referring to as, in fear that the tautology gods have already got me on their list – a game all about the player’s experience – a combination of mounting tension and immediate fear. But it didn’t have to be. The Stroll was a game about walking through the night and into the early morning through foreboding forests and desolate towns, concluding at dawn where the character looks out forlornly across the landscape from a tower, as the sun rises. It can be about anything. My original plan was to stage it solely in the shadow of some kind of alien invasion, but “knowing” the evil takes the fear away, so instead I delivered exposition in a way that builds its own tension, and lets the player decide what is going on. In case I ever actually release it , I’ll avoid giving everything away, but I feel that the ideological premise was important (if I may toot my own over-tooted horn). The Stroll is a base experience. It plays on the human’s sense of inquisition, and most rudimentary fears – darkness, loneliness, abandonment – all senses that the game implies without explicitly stating that “You should feel these things” and this is where I feel I have succeeded in allowing for an experience, instead of crafting one specifically something a lot of games I observe are doing differently.
Ever since there has been indie there has been the notion of the art game; the developer’s need, or want to create an abstract, offbeat and challenging message for the player to approach and scratch their collective chins to, but the problem is that it’s always going to be just another device for the designer to propagate their view of emotion with. The games, or experiences, usually deal with emotionally centred issues, usually of a darker or more impacting tone in order to create evocative commentaries on humanity, life etc but I’m not convinced it’s actually working. Not long ago a read an interesting article on Electron Dance that discussed how the emotional impact in a game and the actual game activity interacts, and what kind of experiences this interaction creates for the player. Games have always faced this issue and have often drawn the compromise of either extreme, but I don’t think this is necessarily the problem as a game can exist solely as story or gameplay. The problem, as I have deduced, comes out of the aforementioned designer attempting to contrive a particular experience for the player. Where it may be something that is truly meaningful to themselves, it is incidentally raising a barrier between emotion and action due to the player’s natural resistance to the projected ideology.
Dealing with contrived versus naturally occurring emotional experiences is a somewhat frustrating topic to deal with, so I think I’ll take a leaf out of Harbour Master’s book and bring out the old Venn diagram. This diagram will be broken into three segments (duh); Intended impact, binary and broad impact. Intended impact deals covers scenarios where the designer has attempted to have the player show a particular emotion; binary is where a situation allows the player to form their own reaction within the context -identified by its apparent limitations; broad is where a situation, location, or visual intentionally or unintentionally causes a player to have a personal, or unexpected reaction. Also, there might be some spoilers. But come on, you should have played these games by now.
Completing the Venn diagram reveals some interesting results in regard to how well these impacting scenarios worked. The reason why these succeed on such a personal level is because they usually worked on either an emotional or cerebral level; blowing up Megaton: I feel is one massive exception to the overall impact of the examples within “Intended impact”, because it is optional, and moralistically grounded; so why put it there? The Megaton sequence is almost a novelty in its operation meaning that people with the slightest intentions of blowing up Megaton, will blow up Megaton for the sheer thrill of it. Then something interesting happens; they lose all of their Karma points, becoming irrevocably “Evil”. This is where the intended impact transforms into broad impact as players will act in unpredictable ways to this new reality, knowing that they will spend the duration of the game as an evil character. But there is something else I’d like to draw upon here; this situation is rooted in choice. The player only feels that they should be responsible for their actions, because they were actions that the player partook in. Contrasting this to something like Paul Jackson’s death, an event that still has a profoundly nihilistic sense of horror to it, Fallout 3 succeeded in creating an enduring impact as the player was always responsible for causality, as opposed to being a “victim” of the story. Furthermore, comparing Paul Jackson’s death to the loss of Hole Station in Metro 2033, it becomes apparent that choice isn’t necessarily the operator in creating emotion, however Metro 2033 puts a lot of empirical power into the player’s hand, whereas the death was very numeric and calculated in the Call of Duty 4 sequence (although, this carried its own personal weight, identifying soldiers as mere numbers). For me, Metro 2033 felt like a constant, hopeless, losing battle as those around me continued to die regardless of my efforts. Someone else might just see this as life.
So where does this leave indie games? Large scale games have the ability to orchestrate grand stories, impressive visuals and contentious sexual exploits to mask up any holes in their delivery, but indie games have got it all on show. Yesterday I played Passage. I thought I should feel sad, but honestly I felt a little bemused. What was this game trying to tell me? I had the underlying suspicion that there was a message buried within its stomach-churning sea of pixels, but I couldn’t find it. Going against my previous assumption, I would class this game as having broad impact. Although it was a little bit sad, it didn’t really ring the “futility of life” bells that I believe it was trying to get at. Herein lies a problem. Passage, although a game that will inevitable make everyone just a bit sad, relies too much on the individual to create an effectively broad impact, but it’s getting there. Maybe the issue is that broadly impacting scenarios really aren’t broad at all; I can’t rely on everyone being afraid of the dark in The Stroll, and ultimately, I’ve created a particular experience for the player. However. The game isn’t about a fear of the dark, but the experience I can help unfold as a result of some carefully implemented themes. My generalisation that a game has to be broadly impacting to be effective is fundamentally flawed because that’s a poor reflection of life. Life is one big passive emotional experience, sharply punctuated with impacting scenarios. Although one scenario might not impact you, there is guaranteed to be someone out there whom it does, and indie games rely on this in order to create their particular, albeit, narrow experiences.
I may have been unnecessarily overbearing in my accusation that indie games are losing the plot because they’re becoming increasingly more about some experience that the developer feels is important. Sure these games exist, don’t even get me started on The Path, but there are still a lot of games out there that are worth the experience that the developer has created. I came into this discussion brandishing a torch and pitchfork; ready to storm the indie village and weed out all self importance, but as you can see, the problem isn’t with the developer. The developer only wants to share what they feel is important, it’s down to the player to interpret this experience in their own way, even if this means not getting it.
So, I shall forge ahead boldly with The Stroll with a refreshed vision. It’s not about trying to scrutinise over an audience, or worrying whether or not someone will get it, it’s about creating an experience. The Stroll is a simple game of atmosphere but the player’s experience is really dictated by themselves. Do they find the dark to be a frightening place? Do they find loneliness uncomfortable? Will they wander into the abandoned hospital and find sadness, horror? Maybe nothing at all, it doesn’t really matter. The emotional impact of indie games is reasonably objective, so I’d like to consider this more of a test, or an experiment. I don’t really mind what I create, just as long as someone gets something out of it.
Okay Miles: initial thoughts.
Disclaimer: I think the frustrating thing about talking about “indie games” is that it’s a enormous umbrella under which all sorts of things have come to rest, which thwarts attempts to articulate Issues.
By and large, most games that try to touch the emotional space of games are very prescriptive as you note. I seems what you’re reaching for is the emotional version of emergent gameplay: reactions and interpretations provided by the player rather than the user. Suddenly, this category feels like it cleaves into two again – response and interpretation, not entirely unrelated.
The Sims 3 is something of an emergent gameplay environment and players often find “emergent emotional reactions” to what they’ve built – just look at Roburky’s Alice and Kev diary. Now as for an “emergent interpretation”, I think that much more likely to find in the indie space. Games that are open-ended in the meaning department are likely to be hard sells. But just look at Passage: what do you think it means?
One interpretation of Passage is that if you hook up with a woman, you can’t go see so much shiny treasure. But that felt rather shallow to me and rather missed the point of why people hook up in the first place; what made me sadface was those moments at the end where your character was alone after hooking up for most of life. That, for me, was the lump in the throat moment. This was the interpretation most relevant to me – to think that down the road, that either myself or my wife are going to be alone for the final years. Mrs. HM found it sad for the same reason.
We’ll still need the prescriptive games as much as we need these games open to personal interpretation: we want our Avatar as much as we want our Lost Highway. Good luck with The Stroll!
[But oh man, these spoilers! Lucky I ain’t touching Metro 2033 and Fallout 3 for some time… I am such a fossil when it comes to playing the games of the moment. Any moment now someone is going to post another list of reasons why Mass Effect is such a great game and tell me the whole story]
Second thought: It’s interesting that when you bounced onto my site a few weeks back, it sounded like you were fairly disappointed with the whole art game scene (I could summarise you as “Passage? PAH!”) – but having given this thing a whole lot of thought, you’ve stepped back a bit and become more generous (“Passage? Meh, okay.”).
My view on art games actually changed whilst I was writing this entry, that tends to happen a lot, if not always. I cannot be trusted. I think what happened (and this can be observed somewhere around the half way mark) is that I realised the fact that the designer probably wasn’t being that pretentious, and just wanted to make something that interested them, and that would provoke interesting reactions from whoever played it, as opposed to some baron holed up in their intellectual ivory tower throwing buckets of fish onto everbody who didn’t get their game AAAAAA off track. Sorry, I am a mentally unstable person and cannot be trusted to say anything coherent or thorough. I apologise in advance.
Ok.
This whole indie game thing is something I’d like too do a bit more digging with, since I kind of intend on making some myself before I can fund my hyper-corperation games machine. Actually, maybe I should write another response in the morning. I’m not actually convinced that I am awake/ lucid at this point in time.
The fact that you’d changed your view was a complement. I change my mind all the time. Originally my Anti Games piece was more hard line, which softened as I rewrote, then Overlooking Ambition is an even softer take on art games – putting the blame on me, if any needs to be dished out, for encouraging a lack of innovation. (And the more I think about, the more incomplete I feel that post is – but such is life!)
I was going to post something to RPS Writers’ Hive in the next week or so, but I think I’ll hold back for now. There’s bound to be lots of posts after the first?? direct link on the Sunday Times to your Hive forum! Congrats on being modded up =)
Yeah, I was pleasantly surprised about that. Which is good because I was about to storm in with torch and pitchfork, complaining that the writer has has gone largely unnoticed and underused in the past months. But that is irrelevant. I sort of feel like doing a retrospective of my writing style, but that will be a little narcissitic, and would give more people a reason to describe my touching on indie games as some kind of grand herasy against the canon. What I really want to do is a retrospect of Metro 2033. Partly because everyone didn’t like it for some reason, but partly because an ending has never made me feel so much guilt for acting human.
Well, speaking as someone who plays at being an indie developer, I find that there are two distinct camps.
There are those who make games purely for their own enjoyment, and be damned anyone else who doesn’t like them. And this is laudable, although I personally don’t understand why someone would go through all that effort just for themselves to enjoy a game.
Then there are those who make games for others to enjoy. I place myself in this category, although I would be the first to admit that I have my share of misses as well as hits. For every Get The Cake, there is a Zero Quest.
Generally, I find that people who make games as an emotional experience often fit more snugly into the first category than the second. And if you are making the gaming equivalent of Marmite, like I Wanna Be The Guy, then you need the courage of your own convictions or you’ll never weather the storm.
But hell, my next game will be an experiment in moral choice, so where does that leave me?
I really don’t know.
ON THE CROSSHAIR OF MY WITHERING CRITICISM. I kid. I’m really interested to see what you come up with as the whole moral choice dealio has really had my mind on edge lately. Finishing Metro 2033 has only complicated things. I really want to write a retrospective of why I thought that game was brilliant but I would a) spoil everything horribly, and b) rouse the hatred of everyone who thought it was bad. Which is like 90% of people.
I guess it’s hard to determine where I would put The Stroll in regards to who I am making it for. The game originally started off as a more gameplay-centric experience, making use of this torch that revealed events that happened in the past, but I turned it to the emotional experience out of the want of simplicity, and as a bit of an experiment. To be honest, I never really considered what the player would get out of that, but I find that interesting. Not having a preconceived idea about what somebody might find in the game really intrigues me.
Your comment on The Passage. Thank you, thank you. The game seemed to be hauled as one the most successful portrait of emotions of all time, yet the best I can say is “… I don’t get it”.
Not that I entirely don’t get what the game maker was trying to deliver, but what they tried to do have failed because of how hopelessly generic it reduced life into. Wear out the kinks, quirks and sparks, what’s left over is not futility, it is bore. Hate to say it, it was one game that left me none the wiser, beside wishing I had the five minutes spent on it back.
How is The Path? I am intrigued by the graphic style, but I’m not too big on their previous work The Graveyard. Yes, it was a beautiful interactive film, but I was expecting a game. I played it rightfully in an art gallery, but as a game, I’ll pass. Beautiful it was.
Apologies – hand slipped and posted the reply before I was ready to do so.
Where I’m going is this, I am looking forward to The Stroll. I think you have tackled something grand here, as horror, especially psychological horror, are the most subjective thing that is incredibly difficult to pin point. Not as wide as say, the topic of Life – I can’t even begin to imagine the challenge The Passage maker was facing; but still horror is incredibly difficult, too.
When it do hit though, it hits hard. Good luck!
And yet I’m still not entirely sure what I am trying to argue here. Although, after much mulling and fending of bizarre and intriguing critique of my writing, I think I may have arived somwhere around here.
http://rockpapershotgun.com/rpsforum/topic.php?id=2983
You gentlemen clearly have minds of iron to wade through my crazy, tengential bullshit.
I¡¦ll right away snatch your rss as I can not in finding your e-mail subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Kindly permit me understand in order that I may just subscribe. Thanks.
Appreciate it for helping out, excellent information.
I do believe all of the ideas you’ve introduced to your post. They are very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are very brief for novices. May you please lengthen them a bit from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.
Have you ever considered creating an e-book or guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog based on the same information you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my audience would value your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail.|
There are lots of discount websites which
have deals which are entirely online.
Your house kiollsos is valueble for me. Thanks!…
http://www.pornogratisdiario.com
Hello! I’ve been reading your blog for a long time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Huffman Texas! Just wanted to mention keep up the excellent work!|
I will right away snatch your rss feed as I can’t to find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Please allow me understand so that I may subscribe. Thanks.
I’ve recently started a blog, the information you provide on this website has helped me greatly. Thanks for all of your time & work. “So full of artless jealousy is guilt, It spills itself in fearing to be spilt.” by William Shakespeare.
As soon as I noticed this site I went on reddit to share some of the love with them.